Auckland Interschool Chess Championship

Tap here for current entries

Contents

Key Information

DateThursday 26 September 2024
TimeStart at 9.15am; Finish by 2.10pm
VenueWaitakere Chess Club, 20 Albert Road, Kelston
Use on-street car parks
Teams 4 players plus one optional reserve
CostFREE
Time ControlEach player has 25 minutes, plus an additional 5 seconds per move

About the Competition

Caveat

The Auckland Interschool Competition has run in most years since Auckland was divided into 5 regions. The top teams from each region would compete in a round robin at the Auckland Chess Centre. The limit of 5 remained as more teams were allowed to qualify in each region, which caused some grief. But the venue had limited space

I (Wayne McDougall) am grateful to the volunteers who ran these free events. Unfortunately schools would often get less than a week's notice, and sometimes the event wouldn't happen at all. And there was no way to tell. I tried asking; I tried offering to help. I'm told the event would be on; but then it doesn't happen. Or I just get ignored. I believe the last event ran in 2019

So no more. I'm giving up trying to go through proper channels. I'm giving up waiting until it is too late to do anything. I'm told that those in charge have no interest in interschool competitions.

So I'm running an event myself. And open to all schools that qualified

If something official does start up, I'm happy to step aside as long as that doesn't inconvenience schools

Otherwise, let's play chess

Differences from the National Interschool Finals rules

  1. Pairings

    We will use Swiss Pairings, as at the National Finals, unless the number of teams in a division is so low that we run a round-robin. It's possible but unlikely, that we combine divisions.

    If we have more than 5 but less than 8 teams, a Swiss pairing may fail. In such a case, we will ensure the best performing teams will play appropriate partners, but the lowest scoring teams may play a team they have already played. Not ideal, but we will swap colours; think of it as a revenge match and your best chance to gain some more points and experience.

  2. Time Restrictions

    Games may be adjudicated early in order to stay on schedule
  3. Illegal Moves

    While we are following both the intent and the rules on illegal moves, it is likely that the National Finals will follow the three-strikes-you're-out policy.
  4. Reserves

    We probably will follow the same rules on the use of reserves as the National Finals, but as the arbiter has a choice we don't know what they might do. We follow the standard procedure normally followed

Schedule

Force Majeure

We will try to adapt to any events outside our control. The most likely change would be to reduce the number of rounds. Our aim will always be to make the best of the situation

Thanks

Team Composition

Reserves

Reserves at National Finals

Wayne first attended a National Final in 2008. We were not a competitive school; it was an honour to qualify and be competing

Some old-hands noted that I wasn't playing my reserve player. I will always be grateful that they took me aside and explained the reality of how schools give reserves some games, as I detailed above. As Wayne became an old-hand himself at National Finals he got to pass on this same wisdom, which has often been gratefully received.

Until one Arbiter decided, with no prior notice, that they were going to incorrectly try and implement the irrelevant reserve policies of the international chess olympiad. And they didn't do it correctly. This had the effect of teams either being unable to play their reserves, or else to simply not notify the officials that their reserves were playing, meaning the names on results and board prizes were incorrect

Wayne wrote to the NZCF asking them to state that an Arbiter wasn't allowed to interfere with how a school used their reserve. Instead they wrote an incoherent new rule giving three options to the Arbiter, but with no requirement of notice of which policy will be used. So we're now in the situation that you may go to the expense of transport and accommodation for a reserve who is denied the ability to play on the whim of an Arbiter, with no warning before flights are booked.

I hope that in most cases reserves will operate as detailed above. But there's no way to be sure.

Information for schools

Information for Teachers, Parents, Visitors, and Spectators

Information for Student Players

Illegal Moves

Under the official rules of chess, your opponent may claim a win if you make two illegal moves. Touch-move violations are not illegal moves. Moving a piece with one hand, and pressing the clock with the other hand is not an illegal move. Adjusting pieces when it is not your turn is not an illegal move

However in interschool tournaments we play as good sports. We want the results to be based on playing ability and not technical rule breaches

If your opponent makes an illegal move, then politely point it out, restart their clock, they take the move back and choose a different move. Touch-move still applies so if they can legally move the piece then they must do so

If you cannot resolve this between yourselves, pause the clock and raise your hand. If they persistently make illegal moves or you think they are trying to gain an unfair advantage, raise your hand

Arbiters will forfeit the game for repeat offenders who are in a losing position, and for those seeking to gain an unfair advantage

Warning Rant

Once upon a time, if you made three illegal moves, your opponent could claim a win. One person decided this was bad for school chess and successfully added a "Good Sportsmanship" rule to the interschool rules so that illegal moves did not lose the game. Except some arbiters in some regions just ignored this new rule. FIDE then changed the rules so that you could claim a win after just two illegal moves. But still some arbiters maintained a practice of three illegal moves. Eventually NZCF changed the interschool rules to say that arbiters had the discretion to forfeit a player repeatedly playing illegal moves.

So we will be following the intent of the NZCF Good Sportsmanship rule; many of you will now be used to the archaic three strikes policy. That may be well what happens at the National Finals. But for this event its probably better practice for you to win your game through gameplay.

It is our opinion that the Good Sportsmanship rule is a mistake; it encourages deliberate cheating and means that events can't be FIDE rated as we are not following FIDE rules. But as long as that is the stated objective of the NZCF for interschool competitions we will honour the intent. Certainly the compromise of a legalistic one count difference between three and two is not worth it.

Time

In theory a chess game could last for days. In practice this is rarely a problem; students usually play too fast. But we do need to finish on time. So we will follow this protocol for the last 3 games being played in each round:

Ratings and Prizes

This event is neither FIDE nor NZCF rated. There are no prizes or medals. There did used to be trophies for the Auckland Interschool Chess Champions - We believe these are lost - likely sitting in a school trophy cabinet somewhere. In any event, we are not authorised to issue such trophies. Although in the absence of an official event, the trophy owners may choose to track down and allocate the trophies to the winners. Don't hold your breath.

The winner may style themselves 'Auckland Interschool Chess Champions'. Who is going to stop you? You have a better claim than anyone else. We will certainly say you are.

There will be personalised digital certificates which you can download, print and share.

Board Prize

There's no provision in the official rules for board prizes at the National Interschool Finals; what happens is at the discretion of the organisers. Sometimes there are no board prizes at all.

What we do: A board prize recognises that you are a good player that may not be in a good team. So if you win all your matches you could win a board prize even if your team doesn't receive any medals. This can be a problem when there are reserves. Let's say you win 5 out of 6 games on board 3, and then your number 1 player has a bye and you move up to board 2. You win, but that doesn't count as a win on board 3. We don't think that's fair. So we reward "outstanding performance" regardless of which board numbers you played on. That said, playing against board 2 player is harder; you are more likely to lose. So some schools won't use reserves in a way that upsets potential board prize winners.

You might be a reserve that only plays 2 games but wins both. We will recognise such a top performance on your certificate.

The only 'board prize' recognition at this tournament is a recognition of notable individual performance on your digital certificate

Health

Phones

Photography

Conflicts of Interest

Disputes

If you have any problems then feel free to discuss with Wayne. We don't mind criticism or complains and we're happy to explain and to try to make you happy

Because this isn't an official anything we don't know how you can appeal. Feel free to diss Wayne on social media and complain to any chess bodies. We will try not to make it necessary

Privacy